I get the impression that you want to tell me and others like me (liberals, pro-aborts, moral relativists - whichever label you prefer) that our marriages or our long-term relationships (should we choose not to get married) are selfish and immoral. Something like that anyway.
Oliver, I keep answering your points and you keep ducking my questions.
My point is simply this: a so-called "long-term" relationship that isn't marriage is essentially different from marriage. It is often an explicit rejection of marriage.
But you will continue to pretend that two different things are the same thing. It don't make it so.
Paul: Just co-habitating is in order to explicitly keep one's options open.
Ori: I see. In Israel, co-habitating is the "due diligence" stage before marriage. Unless something goes seriously wrong, that's where it usually leads.
Last summer, there was a car in the neighborhood on which someone's boyfriend had written on the windows, "Susie, will you move in with me???"
Gosh, darn, how romantic. You would think that, even if one is not embarrassed about co-habitating (now that it's the 21st century, right?), one would be ashamed at such a public display of quasi-commitment -- such overt celebration of mediocrity. "Rejoice with us, world -- we're SIGNING A LEASE together!!!"
I am devoutly Roman Catholic, a veteran of service in the U.S. Air Force, I am husband of a wonderful wife and the father of six children. I hold a BA in Economics from The University of Texas at Arlington and an Associate of Applied Science degree in Interpreting and Translating from the Community College of the Air Force. I am a former candidate for public office, and the charter past grand knight of a Knights of Columbus council.
1. If you want your values to survive into the future, there is no substitute for fertility.
2. No republic can survive the apathy of its citizens. If the people fail to object when their representatives vote to increase their own power, they will be inexorably reduced to slavery.
8 comments:
Do you see any difference between cohabitation and marriage as practiced by non-Catholics, marriage with the option of no-fault divorce?
Most people who enter into marriage in the U.S. today do so with the option of no-fault divorce, willy nilly.
Most of these people don't intend to ever make use of it, so yes, I do see a real difference.
Just co-habitating is in order to explicitly keep one's options open.
I think this a good example of how you see long-term couples who aren't married.
How long is "long-term" Oliver?
You're married, aren't you? How long do you plan to remain married to your wife?
I get the impression that you want to tell me and others like me (liberals, pro-aborts, moral relativists - whichever label you prefer) that our marriages or our long-term relationships (should we choose not to get married) are selfish and immoral. Something like that anyway.
Oliver, I keep answering your points and you keep ducking my questions.
My point is simply this: a so-called "long-term" relationship that isn't marriage is essentially different from marriage. It is often an explicit rejection of marriage.
But you will continue to pretend that two different things are the same thing. It don't make it so.
Paul: Just co-habitating is in order to explicitly keep one's options open.
Ori: I see. In Israel, co-habitating is the "due diligence" stage before marriage. Unless something goes seriously wrong, that's where it usually leads.
That's a funny clip.
Last summer, there was a car in the neighborhood on which someone's boyfriend had written on the windows, "Susie, will you move in with me???"
Gosh, darn, how romantic. You would think that, even if one is not embarrassed about co-habitating (now that it's the 21st century, right?), one would be ashamed at such a public display of quasi-commitment -- such overt celebration of mediocrity. "Rejoice with us, world -- we're SIGNING A LEASE together!!!"
Post a Comment