Monday, May 11, 2009

Tell Me Again...

How "No One Is Pro-Abortion"!



Because some people clearly are (H/T: Southern Appeal):
... a corps of women trying to whittle down the current high rates — estimated at 80 percent — of women who abort at-risk children.

They range from Monica Rafie, a Chicago-area mom of five who in 2001 was told her second child, Celine, would likely die of an underdeveloped right heart ventricle, to Anna Lise "Cubby" LaHood, a Silver Spring woman who learned in the spring of 1988 that her unborn son, Francis, would only live briefly outside the womb.

Both women were encouraged to terminate their pregnancies but refused.

Cubby and husband Dan LaHood decided that while their son may die, it would not be at their hands. Reaction was swift; her family disinherited Mrs. LaHood and refused to see the child. The couple transferred their care to Georgetown University Hospital, a Catholic institution that encouraged her to continue her pregnancy.

"The pressure from the medical community to abort was severe," she said.

On Oct. 6, 1988, Francis was born with polycystic kidney disease. He was held by his parents, quickly photographed and baptized before he died a few minutes later.

Today, the LaHoods are lay Missionaries of Charity, the group founded by Mother Teresa, whose photos decorate the walls of their Silver Spring home. On a small $100,000 annual budget, they operate St. Joseph's House, which provides respite and day care for children with severe disabilities.

"People think your life is over when you have a handicapped child," Mr. LaHood says. "It's a cultural view to eliminate them as undesirable. They don't know what the demands are and what the rewards are."
At the risk of transgressing Godwin's Law, people like the LaHoods are fighting against a culture of death ("life unworthy of life") that the Nazis would have applauded.

And what about Cubby LaHood's parents, who so insisted on an abortion for their adult, married daughter that they disowned her when she refused? This is the true meaning of "choice". Because the only valid "choice" is for abortion. We see it again and again: it's all about the killing. For important reasons like severe disability, for trivial reasons like eye color or pregnancy out of wedlock, and even for no reason at all.

Tell me again, go ahead say it. "No one is pro-abortion." Lie to me.

18 comments:

not crankycon said...

The fact that some pro-choice people are pro-abortion is all the more reason to distinguish between the two categories.

Nod said...

Sorry not crankycon, but I disagree. That is needless hairsplitting. One cannot be a disinterested bystander when it is a matter of life and death.

In that case it is a matter of degree, not kind. "I haven't killed anyone today, but the day's not over yet."

And antipathy is very often worse than love or hate.

not crankycon said...

You can view it as needless hairsplitting if you like, but understand, if your goal is to convince pro-choice people of the error of their ways so that they will support criminalizing abortion, lumping in pro-choice people with pro-abortion people is antagonistic to that goal.

I'd also comment that if there truly is no difference, what's the point of Paul's post?

Paul, just this guy, you know? said...

The standard defense of the "pro-choice" set is the claim that, (as President Obama has said) "no one is pro-abortion."

I have repeatedly shown that this claim is not true.

Dirtdartwife said...

not crankycorn...so if pro-choice isn't synonymous with pro-abortion, why do people that support abortion as a choice hate, abhor, vilify, mock, try-to-destroy, anyone that says "Ok, give the women a real choice... show her the true options of a pregnancy." ???

If pro-choice isn't synonymous with pro-abortion, convince me after looking at Planned Parenthood's website about "choices" and tell my why abortion is their first "option" and all the others are just minor blurps in a HUGE article about "choices".

Arby said...

Claiming to be “pro-choice” but not “pro-abortion” is taking the Pontius Pilate approach towards murdering unborn children. “I know that these people are going to kill Jesus and there is nothing I can do to stop them so I am not going to bother trying to. I wash my hands of the entire deal. I have no responsibility in this.” Let’s alter the verbiage slightly. “I know that these pro-abortion people are going to abort unborn children and there is nothing I can do to stop them so I am not going to bother trying to. I wash my hands of the entire deal. I have no responsibility in this.” It is classic denial. They are using the Constitution as a shield for their complicity in the act. They believe a woman has a Right to murder her unborn child even if they believe they wouldn’t do it themselves. Somehow they see this legal step between themselves and the abortionists keeping their hands clean.

Oliver said...

Let them have their word. Let them call us 'pro-aborts' and 'child-haters'.

This is the best they can do, it seems.

Paul, just this guy, you know? said...

You guys are the ones defending the "right" to kill children.

Anonymous said...

Some people say that they have a constitutional right to an abortion, but that's incorrect. We have constitutional rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press because those rights are mentioned, in the Constitution. Americans would only have a constitutional right to abortion, if abortion was mentioned, in the Constitution. I checked the Constitution, and I didn't see the word "abortion."

Phil Collins

Vir Speluncae Orthodoxae said...

Let them have their word. Let them call us 'pro-aborts' and 'child-haters'.

If the shoe fits...

Jay Anderson said...

If the shoe fits..."EXACTLY!

Anonymous said...

I get so tired of people hiding behind their so-called constitutional rights! A constitutional right is not synonymous with a moral right in the least! It scares me how mixed up most people are when it comes to the sanctity of life...There was a big front page article in our local paper about the burial of a baby that had been found in a garbage bag...they talked about how incredibly sad it was that this baby would never celebrate their 1st birthday - play with their cake, etc, etc,..
This is the same paper that lauds a "woman's right to choose"!

LarryD said...

And now in Sweden it's legally acceptable to abort on the basis of the unborn child's gender. More proof that liberals hate children.

Oliver said...

Uh-uh! Evidence that Swedish liberals like killing babies (they may not hate them, but just like killing them)

Paul, just this guy, you know? said...

As I said, it's a useful least hypothesis.

cubegirl said...

Thank you for this post, Paul. When I was 9 weeks pregnant, I was told I had a blood disorder (from a previous transfusion) that would cause my baby to die 2-7 days after birth from a brain hemorrhage (which I can't spell!).. I was 28, single, a student, and had a 4-year-old by another man. My mother urged... insisted .. that I abort the baby.. as it would be too hard on her if I went through with the pregnancy.. then a funeral. She didn't talk to me.. or help out.. for much of my pregnancy.. as I refused to stop that tiny beating heart. I filled his dresser with little blue clothes. And stocked up on bottles and diapers. I put his crib together myself.. abandoned by my family.. and with a twinge of "knowing" as I got bigger and bigger.. having to explain to others that I may not bring a baby home. No one really understood.
And now he's 16 months old. Healthy as a horse. Crazy little brat. No blood problems afterall. Sometimes things aren't always as they seem.
I'm rambling. And wasting your bandwidth!. Thank you again for the story.

Paul, just this guy, you know? said...

Cubegirl, you're my new hero!

cubegirl said...

Lol.. I was babbling and emotional.. sorry. I think I saw myself in Cubby.